The history of federal health-care programs shows that costs have surpassed estimates by tremendous margins. The exception has been the Medicare prescription drug program, which has controlled costs by injecting the sort of private competition and choice that ObamaCare would dramatically diminish.
Robert Samuelson writes that, when it comes to selling ObamaCare, the “disconnect between what Obama says and what he’s doing is so glaring that most people could not abide it.”
ObamaCare eschews the one proven way to cut health costs — so, while the price of ObamaCare would be higher federal spending, increased deficits, and diminished liberty, what Americans would get in return would be higher health costs and reduced quality of care.
ObamaCare would increase costs, increase deficits, and reduce the quality of health care — and outside of President Obama and other Democrats who are ideologically driven to expand federal power and control, no one wants it.
Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan provides a concise summary of the true costs of Obamacare at the bipartisan health summit, on February 25, 2010.
ObamaCare is even more deplorable than the Senate process that produced it, and every Democratic Senator effectively cast the deciding vote.
At the health-care summit, Democrats tried hard to claim that there’s basic agreement between Republicans (none of whom voted for ObamaCare in either chamber) and Democrats (279 of whom voted for ObamaCare) on health-care issues, but in truth there is a canyon separating the two sides over the question of whether decisions should be made by the American people or by Washington.
President Obama’s claims that ObamaCare has incorporated the best cost-cutting proposals from both sides of the political aisle, are specious. His pledges to conduct state-level medical malpractice reforms, investigate Medicare and Medicaid fraud, increase Medicaid provider payments, and permit health savings accounts in the health exchanges, are vague and plainly lacking in seriousness — while his rhetorical diversions reveal his disregard for empirical evidence and for substantive discussions of serious cost-cutting proposals.
ObamaCare is a “super-welfare” program that Americans can’t afford and don’t want, it has been advanced through sheer ideological willfulness by President Obama and the Democratic Congress, and it not only calls into question our country’s future finances and medicine but raises crucial questions about the nature of a free society.
Just before the final House vote, Rep. Paul Ryan argues that this debate is about what kind of country we are going to be in the 21st century.